MA Jinhua, LI Zixuan, BI Xuejin
2026, 0(4): 5-19.
China's fiscal practice has demonstrated distinctive governance effectiveness and institutional resilience.Yet,over a prolonged period,the theoretical development of public finance has remained marked by path dependence on the Western“market failure”paradigm,leaving explanatory capacity lagging far behind practical innovation.A deeper cause lies in the fact that,in terms of problem-setting,conceptual categories,and evaluative standards,existing studies have not effectively connected Marxism with China's concrete realities,nor have they organically incorporated the value resources of China's fine traditional culture.The“Two Integrations”provide the fundamental guideline for resolving this disciplinary challenge.First,taking Marxism as the analytical starting point,public finance is re-situated within the macro framework of production relations,distributive structure,and national governance.Second,China's national conditions and fine traditional culture are established as the institutional premises and evaluative yardsticks,enabling the modern fiscal system to internalize such cultural foundations as a people-centered orientation,mutual assistance and balancing across groups and regions,and disciplined use consistent with due measure.Under the guidance of the“Two Integrations”,this paper advances“public finance for national governance” as a signature concept,promotes a paradigmatic shift in fiscal research from“mending market failures” to “grounding national governance”,and around the core proposition,constructs a corresponding conceptual system and explanatory framework,with the aim of building an indigenous knowledge system for Chinese public finance that combines explanatory power,normative coherence,and cumulative potential.