万能险产品结算利率是否过高是当前保险政策监管与市场关注的焦点。已有研究大都是从理论层面探讨万能险产品利率制定,实证研究较为缺乏。本文基于我国56家寿险公司2014—2018年的相关数据,从寿险公司经营模式、资金需求和风险承担能力等多个保险公司层面特征实证研究影响我国寿险公司万能险产品结算利率定价的影响因素。研究结果表明:(1)保险公司经营模式与万能险产品结算利率的定价显著相关,偏向资产驱动型经营模式的寿险公司对万能险产品结算利率的定价更高。(2)寿险公司万能险产品结算利率与其在金融市场资金需求程度正相关。(3)风险承担能力强的寿险公司偏向于发行高结算利率的万能险产品。此外,保险公司的退保率、审计质量和员工学历结构等其他公司特征也可能会对万能险的结算利率产生影响。本研究有助于认识万能险结算利率制定与潜在的金融机构资金需求以及风险管理之间的逻辑关联,从实证研究的视角帮助监管层和实务界更好地认识到万能险的保险属性有可能受到保险公司金融市场融资需求的影响甚至扭曲。
Abstract
Whether the settlement rate of universal insurance products is too high is the focus of current insurance policy supervision and market attention.Most of the existing researches discuss the interest rate formulation of universal insurance products from the theoretical level,but empirical research is relatively lacking.Based on the relevant data of 56 life insurance companies in China from 2014 to 2018,this paper empirically studies the factors influencing the settlement rate pricing of universal insurance products of life insurance companies in China from the perspectives of life insurance companies' business model,capital demand and risk bearing capacity.The results show that :(1) the business model of insurance companies is significantly correlated with the pricing of universal insurance product settlement interest rate,and life insurance companies that prefer asset-driven business model have higher pricing of universal insurance product settlement interest rate.(2) The settlement rate of universal insurance products of life insurance companies is positively correlated with its capital demand in the financial market.(3) Life insurance companies with strong risk bearing capacity tend to issue universal insurance products with high settlement interest rate.In addition,other corporate characteristics of insurance companies,such as surrender rate,audit quality and staff education structure,also affect the settlement rate of universal insurance.This study helps to understand the logical relationship between the setting of universal insurance settlement rate and the potential capital demand and risk management of financial institutions,and helps regulators and practitioners to better understand that the insurance property of universal insurance may be affected or even distorted by the financing demand of insurance companies in the financial market from the perspective of empirical research.
关键词
万能险 /
结算利率 /
资金需求 /
风险管理
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Universal life insurance /
Settlement rate /
Financing demand /
Risk management
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号：
F842
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 郭金龙,周华林.保险业的潜在系统性风险[J].中国金融,2016(6):80-82.
[2] 魏丽,杨建垒.万能险的市场选择研究[J].保险研究,2017(2):3-10.
[3] 周县华,范庆泉,覃家明.我国万能险产品可持续发展的最优保证利率研究[J].保险研究,2019(10):84-100.
[4] Rothschild M,Stiglitz J.Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information[M] //Uncertainty in Economics.Academic Press,1978: 257-280.
[5] Koijen R S J,Yogo M.The Cost of Financial Frictions for Life Insurers[J].American Economic Review,2015,105(1): 445-475.
[6] 展凯,申曙光.万能险内在收益率测算与影响因素分析[J].保险研究,2009(7):90-97.
[7] 周桦.中国万能险投资账户最低收益率保证与退保期权的定价研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013(3):557-568.
[8] 薛华,郑海涛,王钰琼.金融市场突变对万能险定价及偿付能力的影响[J].金融研究,2015(4):176-191.
[9] 陈秉正,何宇佳.基于双驱动型动态最优资产负债管理模型的万能险产品经营分析[J].保险研究,2016(5):13-23.
[10] Shleifer A,Vishny R W.Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach[J].The Journal of Finance,1992,47(4): 1343-1366.
[11] Hellwig M F.Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector: An Analysis of the Subprime-Mortgage Financial Crisis[J].De Economist,2009,157(2):129-207.
[12] Calimani S,Hałaj G,Z·ochowski D.Simulating Fire-sales in a Banking and Shadow Banking System[R].ESRB Working Paper Series,2017.
[13] Ellul A,Jotikasthira C,Lundblad C T.Regulatory Pressure and Fire Sales in the Corporate Bond Market[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2011,101(3): 596-620.
[14] 许荣,方明浩,常嘉路.险资持股能够降低公司违规吗?——保险投资的公司治理效应研究[J].保险研究,2019(12):48-64.
[15] 方明浩,许荣,赵昶.险资股权投资的结构性改革研究——基于险资投资的倒U型效应分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2021(3):40-57.
[16] 边文龙,王向楠.投资职能对保险公司风险的影响研究[J].金融研究,2017(12):158-173.
[17] 张绍白.万能险中国十五年[J].中国保险,2014(11):44-46.
[18] 仲赛末,赵桂芹.经营模式对寿险公司财务状况的影响——基于资产负债管理视角[J].经济管理,2018(9):155-172.
[19] 孙立娟,费清.经济泡沫、保险自由化与改革:日本保险业的发展历程[J].现代日本经济,2017(2):79-94.
[20] 秋慧.对近年我国寿险公司“资产驱动型”经营模式失败原因的反思[J].经济研究导刊,2019(11):158-161.
[21] 张诗豪,赵桂芹.资本水平、经营模式与流动性创造——对我国寿险公司的实证检验[J].保险研究,2020(5):3-19.
[22] 韩忠雪,周婷婷.产品市场竞争、融资约束与公司现金持有:基于中国制造业上市公司的实证分析[J].南开管理评论,2011(4):149-160.
[23] Nanda V,Wu W,Zhou X A.Investment Commonality across Insurance Companies: Fire Sale Risk and Corporate Yieldspreads[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2019,54(6): 2543-2574.
[24] Mitchell O S,Poterba J M,Warshawsky M J,Brown J R.New Evidence on the Money's Worth of Individual Annuities[J].American Economic Review,1999,89(5): 1299-1318.
[25] Shane S.Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities[J].Organization Science,2000,11(4): 448-469.
[26] 许家云,毛其淋,佟家栋.出口如何影响了企业的风险承担能力?[J].产业经济研究,2015(2):1-14.
[27] 宋光辉,钱崇秀,许林.商业银行“三性”对其风险承担能力的影响——基于16家上市银行非平衡面板数据的实证检验[J].经济管理,2016,38(9):135-148.
[28] Yang J,Guariglia A,Guo J M.To What Extent Does Corporate Liquidity Affect M&A Decisions,Method of Payment and Performance? Evidence from China[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2019,54: 128-152.
[29] 孙祁祥,边文龙,王向楠.业务集中度对寿险公司利润和风险的作用研究[J].当代经济科学,2015(3):27-38,125.
[30] 尚颖,贾士彬,毕书琨.保险业资产驱动型经营模式会助推系统性金融风险吗?[J].保险研究,2022(2):17-32.
[31] 仲赛末,赵桂芹,张诗豪.寿险机构经营属性分化对金融市场稳定性的影响[J].财经研究,2021(3):125-139.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
中国人民大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目编号:18XNI006)。
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(1270 KB)
