农地抵押贷款发展中国家经验及启示

高名姿, 陈东平

中央财经大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4) : 44-52.

PDF(1093 KB)
PDF(1093 KB)
中央财经大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4) : 44-52.
金融保险

农地抵押贷款发展中国家经验及启示

  • 高名姿, 陈东平
作者信息 +

Experience and Enlightenment of Farmland Mortgage in Developing Countries

  • GAO Ming-zi, CHEN Dong-ping
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

笔者运用荟萃分析法,梳理了发展中国家在农地确权基础上推动的农地抵押贷款对农户信贷可得性的影响,发现:农地抵押贷款没有改善小农户的融资难问题、对大农户的融资难问题有部分缓解,农地处置边际交易成本高、农户的农地产权认知等是影响农地抵押效力的主要原因。印度经验显示,发展农地抵押贷款需要构建政策性银行、合作性金融机构和商业银行相结合的金融体系,并提供配套政策支持。发展中国家经验的启示是:农地确权不能自动提高农地抵押贷款的信贷供给效应,实现农地抵押贷款的信贷供给效应需要配套政策支持。发展农民信用合作组织、建立抵押农地和地上作物收益的处置制度、提高农业保险覆盖率、构建多元化的农地抵押贷款金融体系,可能是促进农地抵押贷款发展的有效措施。

Abstract

This paper uses meta-analysis to sort out the credit supply effect of farmland title in developing countries. Results show that improvement in credit supply do not occur to small farmers. Some big farmers' credit ration problems are relieved. High transaction cost to sell farmland and farmers' property cognition is the main reason. Indian experience shows that a financial system that combines policy banks, cooperative financial institutions and commercial banks is necessary for developing farmland mortgage, policy support is also necessary for developing farmland mortgage. The enlightenment of the experience of developing country's farmland mortgage is as follows: land title cannot automatically increase credit supply to farmers. Development of farmland mortgage needs supporting policy. Foster farmers' own credit cooperative, establish the disposal institution of farmland and above-ground crops, increase the coverage rate of agricultural insurance and establish diversified financial system of farmland mortgage may be the effective measures to promote the development of farmland mortgage.

关键词

农村土地 / 抵押贷款 / 发展中国家 / 荟萃分析 / 印度

Key words

Farmland / Mortgage / Developing country / Meta-analysis / India

引用本文

导出引用
高名姿, 陈东平. 农地抵押贷款发展中国家经验及启示[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2018, 0(4): 44-52
GAO Ming-zi, CHEN Dong-ping. Experience and Enlightenment of Farmland Mortgage in Developing Countries[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2018, 0(4): 44-52
中图分类号: F832.43   

参考文献

[1] Stiglitz J E, Weiss A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information[J]. American Economic Review, 1981, 71(June): 393-410.
[2] 于丽红,兰庆高,戴琳. 不同规模农户农地经营权抵押融资需求差异及影响因素——基于626个农户微观调查数据[J]. 财贸经济, 2015(4): 74-84.
[3] 黄惠春,李静. 农村抵押贷款创新产品的供给意愿:江苏例证[J]. 改革, 2013(9): 131-137.
[4] 曾庆芬. 合约视角下农地抵押融资的困境与出路[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2014(1): 42-47.
[5] 杨奇才,谢璐,韩文龙. 农地经营权抵押贷款的实现与风险:实践与案例评析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2015(10): 4-11.
[6] 曾大鹏. 土地承包经营权抵押的法律困境与现实出路[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017(2): 15-26.
[7] 罗剑朝,庸晖,庞玺成. 农地抵押融资运行模式国际比较及其启示[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(3): 84-96.
[8] Glass G V. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-analysis of Research[J]. Educational Researcher, 1976, 10(5): 3-8.
[9] Lipsey M W, Wilson D B. Practical Meta-analysis[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001.
[10] Jansen K, Roquas E. Modernizing Insecurity: The Land Titling Project in Honduras[J]. Development and Change, 1998(29): 81-106.
[11] Boucher S R, Barham B L, Carter M R. The Impact of “Market-Friendly” Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua[J]. World Development, 2005, 33(1): 107-128.
[12] Carter M R, Olinto P. Getting Institutions “Right” for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 85(1): 173-186.
[13] Field E, Torero M. Do Property Titles Increase Credit Access Among the Urban Poor Evidence from a Nationwide Titling Program[Z]. Department of Economics, Harvard University: 2006.
[14] Fort R. Assessing the Impact of Rural Land Titling in Peru: the Case of the PETT Program[Z]. Washington D.C.: 2008.
[15] Guirkinger C, Boucher S R. Credit Constraints and Productivity in Peruvian Agriculture[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2008, 39(3): 295-308.
[16] Kerekes C, Williamson C. Propertyless in Peru, Even with a Government Land Title[J]. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2010, 69(3): 1011-1033.
[17] Feder G, Onchan T, Raparla T. Collateral, Guaranties and Rural Credit in Developing Countries: Evidence from Asia[J]. Agricultural Economics, 1988(2): 231-245.
[18] Menkhoff L, Neuberger D, Rungruxsirivorn O. Collateral and Its Substitutes in Emerging Markets' Lending[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012(36): 817-834.
[19] Pender J L, Kerr J M. the Effects of Land Sales Restrictions: Evidence from South India[J]. Agricultural Economics, 1999(21): 279-294.
[20] Hare D. The Origins and Influence of Land Property Rights in Vietnam[J]. Development Policy Review, 2008, 26(3): 339-363.
[21] Migot-Adholla S, Hazell P, Blarel B, et al. Indigenous Land Rights Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Constraint on Productivity?[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 1991, 5(1): 155-175.
[22] Besley T. Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(5): 903-937.
[23] Hayes J, Roth M, Zepeda L. Tenure Security, Investment and Productivity in Gambian Agriculture: A Generalized Probit Analysis[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 79(2): 369-382.
[24] Maan V K, Singh A. Role of NABARD and RBI in Agricultural Sector Growth[J]. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology, 2013, 2(3): 39-44.
[25] Saluja H P S, Soni A K, Singh D. A Study on Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Limited: Survey Based Analysis[J]. Golden Research Thoughts, 2012, 2(4): 1-10.
[26] Ramakrishnan K, Soundaranayahi S. Study on Sources of Fund of Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks in Composite to Thanjavur District[J]. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 2013, 4(7): 13-15.
[27] 邓晓霞. 中印农村金融体系比较[M]. 成都: 西南财经大学出版社, 2011.
[28] Rao V V, Madhavi B. Role of Rural Cooperative Credit Institutions Towards Agricultural Credit in India[J]. Research Journal of Commerce & Behavioural Science, 2016, 5(12): 14-21.
[29] Bista D R, Kumar P, Mathur V C. Progress and Performance of Kisan Credit Card Scheme with a Case Study of Bihar[J]. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 2012, 25(1): 125-135.
[30] 汪险生,郭忠兴. 信息不对称、团体信用与农地抵押贷款——基于同心模式的分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016(3): 61-71.
[31] 张龙耀,褚保金. 农村资产抵押化的前提与绩效:宁波样本[J]. 改革, 2010(11): 86-90.
[32] 黄惠春,曹青,曲福田. 农村土地承包经营权可抵押性及其约束条件分析——以湖北与江苏的试点为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014(6): 44-50.
[33] 王兴稳,纪月清. 农地产权、农地价值与农地抵押融资——基于农村信贷员的调查研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 7(4): 71-75.
[34] 兰庆高,惠献波,于丽红,等. 农村土地经营权抵押贷款意愿及其影响因素研究——基于农村信贷员的调查分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013(7): 78-84.
[35] 杨建莹. 商业银行抵押贷款问题调查[J]. 金融研究, 2008(3): 79-87.

基金

国家自然科学基金“合作社内农户信用合作契约达成及治理结构选择”(项目批准号:71673138);国家自然科学基金“农民资金互助组织演化过程中风险累积的识别与抑制研究”(项目批准号:71273138)。
PDF(1093 KB)

112

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/