This paper analyzes the rent theory of the contemporary west economics, especially places an emphasis on expounding the core concept “economic rent”, the “scarce rent” of natural resources and the “Hotelling rent” of mineral resources in the rent theory of neoclassical economics. Then,this paper puts forward that the resources tax, which exists as tax, not the embody of rent, is based theoretically on adjusting the divergence of social and private aim because of the two layers of the natural resources’ social attribute. In other words, on one hand, exploiting the resources has the obvious private attribute for profits, on the other hand, exploiting the resources as a whole, the social common treasure, has the obvious social public attribute, so that there are some differences between private aims and social aims. Particularly, because the external cost of exploiting resources, the divergence of private discount rate and social discount rate harming the fairness between generations in the using of the resources, and the monopoly of resources harming the social fairness, the resources tax cannot but exists, and its function can not be replaced. This paper puts forward the long aim of the reform should be to separate and reassemble rental and tax for them to return to their appropriate places, so that the resources tax play a pole on adjusting the divergence of social and private aim during the process of exploiting resources.
Chen Wendong.
The evolution of Western rent theory and its impact on resource tax[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2007, 0(06): 0-0