The Research on the Influence Mechanism of Interpretation Strategy Selection Based on Co-branding Type on Consumer Evaluation of New Product

SUN Guo-hui, LIU Pei

Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4) : 93-100.

PDF(1149 KB)
PDF(1149 KB)
Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4) : 93-100.

The Research on the Influence Mechanism of Interpretation Strategy Selection Based on Co-branding Type on Consumer Evaluation of New Product

  • SUN Guo-hui, LIU Pei
Author information +
History +

Abstract

According to the type of co-branding,enterprises can choose appropriate and effective interpretatioin strategies to obtain consumers’ positive response to new products of co-branding,which can effectively enhance the market competitiveness.Previous researches on consumers' reaction to the new products of co-branding mostly focused on the influence of brand factors,such as the matching degree,correlation degree,closeness degree and brand awareness.But the influence of co-branding promotion strategy selection has been ignored.Based on the concept combination theory and information processing fluency theory,this study explores the difference and influence mechanism of different interpretation strategies on consumer’ new products evaluation according to the type of co-branding.The results showed that attribute interpretation strategy is beneficial to improve consumers' evaluation of new products under categorical similarity co-branding,and relation interpretation strategy is beneficial to improve consumers' evaluation of new products under thematic similarity co-branding.Information processing fluency plays a mediating role in the interaction between co-branding type and interpretation strategy on the influence of new product evaluation.This study reveals the internal mechanism of consumers' response to co-branding and draws the corresponding conclusions,which is a beneficial extension to the research of co-branding theory,and enriches the existing literature on the selection of interpretation strategy and consumers' new product evaluation in co-branding.The findings also provide theoretical support and management implications for enterprises' practical activities such as how to choose interpretation strategies according to co-branding types and how to improve consumers' praise for new products.

Key words

Co-branding / Categorical similarity / Thematic similarity / Attribute interpretation strategy / Relation interpretation strategy / Information processing fluency

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Guo-hui, LIU Pei. The Research on the Influence Mechanism of Interpretation Strategy Selection Based on Co-branding Type on Consumer Evaluation of New Product[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2021, 0(4): 93-100

References

[1] Newmeyer C E,Venkatesh R,Ruth J A,et al.A Typology of Brand Alliances and Consumer Awareness of Brand Alliance Integration[J].Marketing Letters,2018,29(3):275-289.
[2] Levin I P,Levin A M.Modeling the Role of Brand Alliances in the Assimilation of Product Evaluations[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology,2000,9(1):43-52.
[3] Cunha Jr M,Forehand M R,Angle J W.Riding Coattails:When Co-branding Helps Versus Hurts Less-known Brands[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2014,41(5):1284-1300.
[4] 李桂华,申媛婷.要素品牌策略、营销能力与品牌绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2019(1):115-127.
[5] Baumgarth C.Evaluations of Co-brands and Spill-over Effects:Further Empirical Results[J].Journal of Marketing Communications,2004,10(2):115-131.
[6] Zdravkovic S,Magnusson P,Stanley S M.Dimensions of Fit between A Brand and a Social Cause and Their Influence on Attitudes[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,2010,27(2):151-160.
[7] Ahn H,Sung Y.A Two-dimensional Approach to Between-partner Fit in Co-branding Evaluations[J].Journal of Brand Management,2012,19(5):414-424.
[8] Kostyra D S,Klapper D.Signaling Teamwork:How Brand Prominence in Brand Alliance Communication Can Influence Customer Perception[J].Marketing:ZFP-Journal of Research and Management,2015,37(2):69-78.
[9] Chiambaretto P,Gurău C,Le Roy F.Coopetitive Branding:Definition,Typology,Benefits and Risks[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2016,57:86-96.
[10] 陆娟,边雅静.不同元素品牌联合模式下的主品牌联合效应研究[J].管理世界,2010(11):114-122.
[11] 王晓珍,郑颖,施佳蓉,等.要素品牌联合紧密度对联合后主品牌评价的影响研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2019 (4):118-128.
[12] Chang C.Ad Framing Effects for Consumption Products:An Affect Priming Process[J].Psychology & Marketing,2008,25(1):24-46.
[13] Washburn J H,Till B D,Priluck R.Brand Alliance and Customer-based Brand-equity Effects[J].Psychology & Marketing,2004,21(7):487-508.
[14] Estes Z,Gibbert M,Guest D,et al.A Dual-process Model of Brand Extension:Taxonomic Feature-based and Thematic Relation-based Similarity Independently Drive Brand Extension Evaluation[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012,22(1):86-101.
[15] 陆娟,边雅静,吴芳.品牌联合的消费者评价及其影响因素:基于二维结构的实证分析[J].管理世界,2009(10):115-125.
[16] 杨晶,李先国,王小洋.品牌联盟对合伙品牌个性的稀释作用研究[J].中国软科学,2015 (10):125-133.
[17] Koschmann A,Bowman D.Evaluating Marketplace Synergies of Ingredient Brand Alliances[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,2018,35(4):575-590.
[18] Janiszewski C,Van Osselaer S M J.A Connectionist Model of Brand-quality Associations[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2000,37(3):331-350.
[19] Newmeyer C E,Ruth J A.Good Times and Bad:Responsibility in Brand Alliances[J].European Journal of Marketing,2020,54(2):448-471.
[20] 刘烨,傅小兰.概念组合的理论模型[J].心理科学进展,2005(1):17-26.
[21] Rajagopal P,Burnkrant R E.Consumer Evaluations of Hybrid Products[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2008,36(2):232-241.
[22] 牟宇鹏,汪涛,张辉.基于分类理论的混合产品消费者评价效应[J].管理学报,2018(1):93-102.
[23] 聂春艳,汪涛,赵鹏,等.解释框架对文化混搭产品评价的影响——比较焦点和解释策略的调节效应[J].心理学报,2018(12):1438-1448.
[24] Desai K K,Gauri D K,Ma Y.An Empirical Investigation of Composite Product Choice[J].Journal of Retailing,2014,90(4):493-510.
[25] Lanska M,Olds J M,Westerman D L.Fluency Effects in Recognition Memory:Are Perceptual Fluency and Conceptual Fluency Interchangeable?[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2014,40(1):1-11.
[26] Reber R,Schwarz N,Winkielman P.Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure:Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?[J].Personality and social psychology review,2004,8(4):364-382.
[27] Lee A Y,Labroo A A.The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2004,41(2):151-165.
[28] 孙瑾,苗盼.近筹vs.远略——解释水平视角的绿色广告有效性研究[J].南开管理评论,2018(4):195-205.
[29] 李东进,张成虎,马明龙.脱销情境下消费者会购买相似品吗——自我建构视角的分析[J].南开管理评论,2016(3):98-109.
[30] Sirianni N J,Bitner M J,Brown S W,et al.Branded Service Encounters:Strategically Aligning Employee Behavior with the Brand Positioning[J].Journal of Marketing,2013,77(6):108-123.
[31] Novemsky N,Dhar R,Schwarz N,et al.Preference Fluency in Choice[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2007,44(3):347-356.
[32] Labroo A A,Lee A Y.Between two Brands:A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2006,43(3):374-385.
[33] 何云,钟科,孙程程.城门失火,可否 “惠” 及池鱼?——成品负面事件对要素品牌的反向溢出效应研究[J].外国经济与管理,2017(11):3-13.
[34] Park C W,Jun S Y,Shocker A D.Composite Branding Alliances:An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1996,33(4):453-466.
[35] Swaminathan V,Gürhan-Canli Z,Kubat U,et al.How,When,and Why Do Attribute-complementary Versus Attribute-similar Cobrands Affect Brand Evaluations:A Concept Combination Perspective[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2015,42(1):45-58.
[36] Kim H,John D R.Consumer Response to Brand Extensions:Construal Level as a Moderator of the Importance of Perceived fit[J].Journal of consumer psychology,2008,18(2):116-126.
[37] Sundar A,Noseworthy T J.Place the Logo High or Low? Using Conceptual Metaphors of Power in Packaging Design[J].Journal of Marketing,2014,78(5):138-151.
[38] Preacher K J,Hayes A F.Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple mediator Models[J].Behavior research methods,2008,40(3):879-891.
PDF(1149 KB)

46

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/