Risk Management of Trust Schemes: A Case Study

WANG Ping, LIU Yuan-yuan

Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2) : 53-63.

PDF(1196 KB)
PDF(1196 KB)
Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2) : 53-63.

Risk Management of Trust Schemes: A Case Study

  • WANG Ping, LIU Yuan-yuan
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper uses the case study method to sort out the specific operation process of a trust risk scheme of the case enterprise.This paper believes that the core of the trust scheme risk management lies in the improvement of management ability of the trust company.It is proposed that the trust company should adjust the organizational structure and improve the current system; further refine the operational rules of the business department, risk control department, and trust asset supervision department; rationalize the division of functions between the business department and the trust asset supervision department; incorporate trust risk schemes into the year-end performance appraisal; and enhance the risk management ability of prevention and control by strengthening the feedback.Previous studies have basically adopted empirical research or normative research methods.The research content is mainly from the perspective of external trust companies, and the risk management is studied from the macro level.Practical guidance is insufficient in the conclusions of these stu-dies.The research methods and research contents of this paper are different from the previous ones.The conclusions in this paper have strong operability and can be directly applied to the practice of trust scheme risk ma-nagement of small and medium trust companies.

Key words

Trust scheme / Risk management / Operating regulation / Segregation of duty

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Ping, LIU Yuan-yuan. Risk Management of Trust Schemes: A Case Study[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2019, 0(2): 53-63

References

[1] Kardorf S. How Are Banking Supervision Measures Influencing Banks' Overall Risk Management?[J].Journal o f Securities Operations & Custody,2018, 10(3): 202-209.
[2] Laeven L, Levine R. Bank Governance, Regulation and Risk Taking[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(2): 259-275.
[3] Minton B, Taillard J, Williamson R. Financial Expertise of the Board, Risk Taking, and Performance: Evidence from Bank Holding Companies[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2014, 49(2): 351-380.
[4] Andries A M, Brown M. Credit Booms and Busts in Emerging Markets: The Role of Bank Governance and Risk Management[J].Economics of Transition, 2017,25(3): 377-437.
[5] Berg T.Playing the Devil's Advocate: The Causal Effect of Risk Management on Loan Quality[J].Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28(12):3367-3406.
[6] Hertzberg A, Liberti J M, Paravisini D.Information and Incentives Inside the Firm: Evidence from Loan Officer Rotation[J].Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(3): 795-828.
[7] Ellul A, Yerramilli V. Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S.Bank Holding Companies[J].Journal of Finance, 2013, 68(5): 1757-1803.
[8] Liberti J M, Mian A R. Estimating the Effect of Hierarchies on Information Use[J].Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(10): 4057-4090.
[9] Cole S, Kanz M, Klapper L. Incentivizing Calculated Risk-taking: Evidence from an Experiment with Commercial Bank Loan Officers[J].Journal of Finance, 2015,70(2): 537-575.
[10] Qian J, Strahan P, Yang Z. The Impact of Incentives and Communication Costs on Information Production and Use: Evidence from Bank Lending[J].Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(4): 1457-1493.
[11] Li J, Liu X. Trust Beneficiary Protection, Ownership Structure, and Risk Taking of Trust Corporations: Evidence from China[J].Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2017, 53(6): 1318-1336.
[12] 李国柱, 马君潞.风险承担、风险缓冲与管理理念:关于信托公司风险管理的思考[J].经济与管理,2006(7):45-49.
[13] 高茵.巴塞尔新资本协议下我国信托业全面风险管理思考[J].商业时代,2011(16):48-50.
[14] 余彤.我国当前的信托风险管理[J].金融财税,2012(6):104-105.
[15] 朱丽萍.我国信托业务风险的特征、来源与影响因素分析[J].价格理论与实践,2015(3):93-95.
[16] 顾海峰.中国信托公司的风险分布特征及防控机制研究[J].政策研究,2015(8):3-6.
[17] 曾忠生.中国信托机构风险管理研究[A].暨南大学博士学位论文, 2005-10-20.
[18] 李将军.中国信托业的金融逻辑、功能和风险防范[J].财经理论与实践, 2013(2):8-13.
[19] 袁吉伟.信托项目风险成因与处置方法研究——基于26个信托风险事件[J].金融发展研究, 2013(9):53-59.
[20] 袁吉伟.我国信托公司操作风险管理问题与对策研究[J].金融理论与实践, 2014(3):103-108.
[21] 任翔.新形势下信托业防范和化解潜在风险的对策思考[J].福建金融, 2018(3):74-78.
[22] 顾海峰,刘丹丹.中国信托公司风险运营效率评价体系及实证研究:来自信托业68 家机构的经验证据[J].当代经济科学,2015,37(2):27-36.
[23] 李生昭,张磊,祝立群.中国信托业“刚性兑付”问题成因分析及对策研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2015(8):44-53.
[24] 阎庆民.我国商业银行信用风险VaR的实证分析[J].金融研究, 2004(10):40-43.
[25] 中国信托业协会.信托监管与自律[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2012:54-55.
PDF(1196 KB)

10

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/